Skip to contentAnemo
EN
Contact

How to Plan Next Year's Software Budget

· 4 min read

Next year's software budget is not one number for one project. It is four lines that behave differently: building new things, keeping existing things running, licences and infrastructure, and the reserve for what breaks. Most budgets that fail in June failed because the second and fourth lines were left out in October.

This guide is for the person who has to submit a figure to a board or a finance team and then defend it, without a technical background to fall back on.

Key takeaways

The four lines

New work. The projects you intend to start or finish. This is the line everyone focuses on, and it is usually the only one presented.

Maintenance and support. Keeping what you already run: fixes, updates, security patches, small changes requested by the business, and the support arrangement with whoever built it. This is not optional spending, it is the cost of having the thing at all.

Licences, infrastructure and services. Cloud hosting, databases, monitoring, per-seat tools, payment and messaging providers, domains and certificates. Most of these scale with usage or headcount.

Reserve. The line for the incident, the urgent integration, the supplier that raises prices, the regulation that changes. If it is not in the budget, the first unplanned event becomes a request for more money, which is a much harder conversation than a line item agreed in advance.

Work out what you already own before adding anything

Before deciding what to build, list the systems you currently run, who maintains each, what each costs annually, and what would happen if it stopped. Most organisations find at least one system nobody has a named owner for, and at least one recurring cost nobody can explain.

That list is the most useful page in the whole exercise. It converts the budget conversation from a wish list into an inventory with numbers attached.

Decide the ratio between running and building

The practical question a board will ask is how much of the budget goes to new capability and how much to keeping the lights on. There is no correct ratio, but there is a correct way to answer it.

If almost everything goes to maintenance, that is a signal about the state of the existing estate, and the conversation should be about modernisation rather than about the budget. If almost nothing does, the maintenance is either being absorbed invisibly by internal staff or it is not happening, and both of those become visible within a year.

Present it as consequences, not as costs

A board does not evaluate software spending on merit, it compares it against everything else. So each line needs a consequence attached.

Get the timing right

Budget approval usually runs from October to December, which means the decisions about what to build next year are made before the current year has finished. Two habits make that easier.

First, keep a running list of requests through the year, with dates, so the October conversation is based on a record rather than on whoever asked most recently. Second, do a short review in September of what was budgeted this year against what was actually spent, because that difference is the best available estimate for next year.

If building next year's plan surfaces work that needs scoping before the budget is submitted, Discuss Your Plan.

Frequently asked questions

How much should be set aside for maintenance?

Enough to cover fixes, updates, security work and small changes for everything currently running. Rather than guessing a percentage, count what it actually cost this year and adjust for anything new going live.

What should go in the reserve?

Incidents, urgent integrations, supplier price changes and regulatory work. Size it against what actually happened over the last two years, which is a better guide than a round number.

When is the budget too optimistic?

When it contains new projects and no maintenance line, when it assumes recurring costs stay flat, or when every project is scheduled to start in the first quarter. All three are common and all three unwind by the middle of the year.

How we would work on this

Related services

Related reading

Building the product for what comes next

We would rather deliver one product that holds up than three that have to be rebuilt. That standard is the same on every project, whatever its size.

Ali Boran GazelCEO

Contact us